[users] New OpenVPN versions

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?


-----<quote>----------

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi Yury,

No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not seen any response to my message.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systeembeheerder

tio

hogeschool hospitality en toerisme


begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl




From: Yury V. Zaytsev
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:15 AM
To: RPMforge users
Subject: Re: [users] New OpenVPN versions

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.
--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101203/ac8236d6/attachment.html

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not
seen any response to my message.

The package has been published:

http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

This update will take down any existing users who use routes. I had an
e-commerce site disappear this morning when openvpn-2.1.4-1.el5.rf.i386
came in.

OpenVPN can't run the 'route' command due to changes in script handling.
The work-around is to add:

script-security 3 system

to the config file, which forces it to use the old system() method of
running the route command. Presumably there's a new way to handle
routes - I haven't looked into that yet.

Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

-Bill

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

I suppose if we added:

script-security 3 system

to

/etc/openvpn/*conf

that would catch most cases (assuming people keep their configs in the
default location).

It should also be possible to patch openvpn to patch openvpn to behave
this way by default, which would catch everybody, no matter where they
put their configs. I'm not sure if rpmforge should do that or not.

-Bill

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

We don't ship any default configs for openvpn. As for the level of
change, there is no policy for rpmforge and I always tried to ship the
latest version. I said it often before I don't consider rpmforge to be a
ditsribution.

Another point, for my configuration I did not have to change anything at
all in my configs and I do use route-push. The script-security flags
default is 1 which means "Only call built-in executables such as
ifconfig, ip, route, or netsh." That is perfeclty fine for most users.

Chris

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

I suppose if we added:

script-security 3 system

to

/etc/openvpn/*conf

that would catch most cases (assuming people keep their configs in the
default location).

It should also be possible to patch openvpn to patch openvpn to behave
this way by default, which would catch everybody, no matter where they
put their configs. I'm not sure if rpmforge should do that or not.

-Bill

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

We don't ship any default configs for openvpn. As for the level of
change, there is no policy for rpmforge and I always tried to ship the
latest version. I said it often before I don't consider rpmforge to be a
ditsribution.

Another point, for my configuration I did not have to change anything at
all in my configs and I do use route-push. The script-security flags
default is 1 which means "Only call built-in executables such as
ifconfig, ip, route, or netsh." That is perfeclty fine for most users.

Chris

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

I suppose if we added:

script-security 3 system

to

/etc/openvpn/*conf

that would catch most cases (assuming people keep their configs in the
default location).

It should also be possible to patch openvpn to patch openvpn to behave
this way by default, which would catch everybody, no matter where they
put their configs. I'm not sure if rpmforge should do that or not.

-Bill

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

We don't ship any default configs for openvpn. As for the level of
change, there is no policy for rpmforge and I always tried to ship the
latest version. I said it often before I don't consider rpmforge to be a
ditsribution.

Another point, for my configuration I did not have to change anything at
all in my configs and I do use route-push. The script-security flags
default is 1 which means "Only call built-in executables such as
ifconfig, ip, route, or netsh." That is perfeclty fine for most users.

Chris

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

I suppose if we added:

script-security 3 system

to

/etc/openvpn/*conf

that would catch most cases (assuming people keep their configs in the
default location).

It should also be possible to patch openvpn to patch openvpn to behave
this way by default, which would catch everybody, no matter where they
put their configs. I'm not sure if rpmforge should do that or not.

-Bill

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

We don't ship any default configs for openvpn. As for the level of
change, there is no policy for rpmforge and I always tried to ship the
latest version. I said it often before I don't consider rpmforge to be a
ditsribution.

Another point, for my configuration I did not have to change anything at
all in my configs and I do use route-push. The script-security flags
default is 1 which means "Only call built-in executables such as
ifconfig, ip, route, or netsh." That is perfeclty fine for most users.

Chris

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

I suppose if we added:

script-security 3 system

to

/etc/openvpn/*conf

that would catch most cases (assuming people keep their configs in the
default location).

It should also be possible to patch openvpn to patch openvpn to behave
this way by default, which would catch everybody, no matter where they
put their configs. I'm not sure if rpmforge should do that or not.

-Bill

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

We don't ship any default configs for openvpn. As for the level of
change, there is no policy for rpmforge and I always tried to ship the
latest version. I said it often before I don't consider rpmforge to be a
ditsribution.

Another point, for my configuration I did not have to change anything at
all in my configs and I do use route-push. The script-security flags
default is 1 which means "Only call built-in executables such as
ifconfig, ip, route, or netsh." That is perfeclty fine for most users.

Chris

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bill McGonigle
Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

Is there anything we can do at the package level? Update default configs
using sed? Patches welcome.

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

This update will take down any existing users who use routes. I had an
e-commerce site disappear this morning when openvpn-2.1.4-1.el5.rf.i386
came in.

OpenVPN can't run the 'route' command due to changes in script handling.
The work-around is to add:

script-security 3 system

to the config file, which forces it to use the old system() method of
running the route command. Presumably there's a new way to handle
routes - I haven't looked into that yet.

Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

-Bill

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

This update will take down any existing users who use routes. I had an
e-commerce site disappear this morning when openvpn-2.1.4-1.el5.rf.i386
came in.

OpenVPN can't run the 'route' command due to changes in script handling.
The work-around is to add:

script-security 3 system

to the config file, which forces it to use the old system() method of
running the route command. Presumably there's a new way to handle
routes - I haven't looked into that yet.

Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

-Bill

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

This update will take down any existing users who use routes. I had an
e-commerce site disappear this morning when openvpn-2.1.4-1.el5.rf.i386
came in.

OpenVPN can't run the 'route' command due to changes in script handling.
The work-around is to add:

script-security 3 system

to the config file, which forces it to use the old system() method of
running the route command. Presumably there's a new way to handle
routes - I haven't looked into that yet.

Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

-Bill

[Bill McGonigle]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

This update will take down any existing users who use routes. I had an
e-commerce site disappear this morning when openvpn-2.1.4-1.el5.rf.i386
came in.

OpenVPN can't run the 'route' command due to changes in script handling.
The work-around is to add:

script-security 3 system

to the config file, which forces it to use the old system() method of
running the route command. Presumably there's a new way to handle
routes - I haven't looked into that yet.

Is this level of change appropriate on the el5 branch?

-Bill

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not
seen any response to my message.

The package has been published:

http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not
seen any response to my message.

The package has been published:

http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not
seen any response to my message.

The package has been published:

http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not
seen any response to my message.

The package has been published:

http://packages.sw.be/openvpn/

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi Yury,

No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not seen any response to my message.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systeembeheerder

tio

hogeschool hospitality en toerisme


begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl




From: Yury V. Zaytsev
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:15 AM
To: RPMforge users
Subject: Re: [users] New OpenVPN versions

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.
--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101203/ac8236d6/attachment-0001.html

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi Yury,

No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not seen any response to my message.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systeembeheerder

tio

hogeschool hospitality en toerisme


begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl




From: Yury V. Zaytsev
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:15 AM
To: RPMforge users
Subject: Re: [users] New OpenVPN versions

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.
--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101203/ac8236d6/attachment-0002.html

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi Yury,

No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not seen any response to my message.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systeembeheerder

tio

hogeschool hospitality en toerisme


begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl




From: Yury V. Zaytsev
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:15 AM
To: RPMforge users
Subject: Re: [users] New OpenVPN versions

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.
--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101203/ac8236d6/attachment-0003.html

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi Yury,

No problem, just wasn?t sure any action had been taken as I had not seen any response to my message.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systeembeheerder

tio

hogeschool hospitality en toerisme


begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhoven
t 040 296 28 28 / f 040 237 35 20
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl




From: Yury V. Zaytsev
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:15 AM
To: RPMforge users
Subject: Re: [users] New OpenVPN versions

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.
--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20101203/ac8236d6/attachment-0004.html>

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Bonno Bloksma
I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?

Christoph has recently committed an OpenVPN 2.1.x SPEC, you have to wait
for the build to happen.

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?


-----<quote>----------

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?


-----<quote>----------

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?


-----<quote>----------

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi,

I have seen no replies to the message below, nor are there any new openvpn
2.1.x packages available. Did my message make it to the list?


-----<quote>----------

I used to look at http://packages.sw.be/ to find a new RPM version of
Openvpn. As a company we now use Debian Linux but I sometimes still point
people that way when they want to get a recent openvpn rpm.

I want to let you know that the site no longer creates new OpenVPN updated
rpms. The last ones are still from the 2.0.x lines. Propably due to the new
structure of the OpenVPN.net site.

Something you may want to look into as we are now well into the new 2.1
series and allready into beta 3 of the 2.2 series.



Yours sincerely,
Bonno Bloksma
senior systemadministrator

tio

university of applied sciences for hospitality and tourism
julianalaan 9 / 7553 ab hengelo
netherlands
t [phone] / f [phone]
b.bloksma at tio.nl / www.tio.nl