[suggest] Perl module update requests

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Updates to the latest versions for the following modules requested:

perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

Chri

[Jani Ollikainen]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
perl-DBI isn't:

Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed

[Christoph Maser]

Thanks for the report. It was already reported and taken care of.

Regards
Chris

Post by Jani Ollikainen

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed
--
Yhteisty?terveisin,
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[Christoph Maser]

Thanks for the report. It was already reported and taken care of.

Regards
Chris

Post by Jani Ollikainen

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed
--
Yhteisty?terveisin,
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[Christoph Maser]

Thanks for the report. It was already reported and taken care of.

Regards
Chris

Post by Jani Ollikainen

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed
--
Yhteisty?terveisin,
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[Christoph Maser]

Thanks for the report. It was already reported and taken care of.

Regards
Chris

Post by Jani Ollikainen

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed
--
Yhteisty?terveisin,
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[Christoph Maser]

Thanks for the report. It was already reported and taken care of.

Regards
Chris

Post by Jani Ollikainen

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed
--
Yhteisty?terveisin,
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[Jani Ollikainen]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
perl-DBI isn't:

Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed

[Jani Ollikainen]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
perl-DBI isn't:

Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed

[Jani Ollikainen]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
perl-DBI isn't:

Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed

[Jani Ollikainen]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

It would be nice, if those would be signed, at least
perl-DBI isn't:

Package perl-DBI-1.611-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm is not signed

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Updates to the latest versions for the following modules requested:

perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

Chri

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Updates to the latest versions for the following modules requested:

perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

Chri

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Updates to the latest versions for the following modules requested:

perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

Chri

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Updates to the latest versions for the following modules requested:

perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
perl-DBI
perl-SOAP-Lite
perl-Image-ExifTool
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

I commited updates for those packages to svn.

Chri

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
version of these modules:

namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped

It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Ok no we get some fun:

ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.

Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped
It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Christoph Maser
ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.
Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Some things we cannot and should not fix, much as perl-XML-LibXML :-)

Another thing that might happen in the future (did happen in the past) is
that we ship some package before Red Hat does (eg. dnsmasq) and then Red
Hat adds it in a future update release but with an older version.

That means that people who had dnsmasq already installed, will not get Red
Hat updates, since they have been using a newer version that predates Red
Hat's package. But if we pull that package from the repository after the
fact, they will also stop getting updates from us.

So there is no good solution either :-(

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Christoph Maser
ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.
Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Some things we cannot and should not fix, much as perl-XML-LibXML :-)

Another thing that might happen in the future (did happen in the past) is
that we ship some package before Red Hat does (eg. dnsmasq) and then Red
Hat adds it in a future update release but with an older version.

That means that people who had dnsmasq already installed, will not get Red
Hat updates, since they have been using a newer version that predates Red
Hat's package. But if we pull that package from the repository after the
fact, they will also stop getting updates from us.

So there is no good solution either :-(

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Christoph Maser
ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.
Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Some things we cannot and should not fix, much as perl-XML-LibXML :-)

Another thing that might happen in the future (did happen in the past) is
that we ship some package before Red Hat does (eg. dnsmasq) and then Red
Hat adds it in a future update release but with an older version.

That means that people who had dnsmasq already installed, will not get Red
Hat updates, since they have been using a newer version that predates Red
Hat's package. But if we pull that package from the repository after the
fact, they will also stop getting updates from us.

So there is no good solution either :-(

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Christoph Maser
ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.
Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Some things we cannot and should not fix, much as perl-XML-LibXML :-)

Another thing that might happen in the future (did happen in the past) is
that we ship some package before Red Hat does (eg. dnsmasq) and then Red
Hat adds it in a future update release but with an older version.

That means that people who had dnsmasq already installed, will not get Red
Hat updates, since they have been using a newer version that predates Red
Hat's package. But if we pull that package from the repository after the
fact, they will also stop getting updates from us.

So there is no good solution either :-(

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Christoph Maser
ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.
Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Some things we cannot and should not fix, much as perl-XML-LibXML :-)

Another thing that might happen in the future (did happen in the past) is
that we ship some package before Red Hat does (eg. dnsmasq) and then Red
Hat adds it in a future update release but with an older version.

That means that people who had dnsmasq already installed, will not get Red
Hat updates, since they have been using a newer version that predates Red
Hat's package. But if we pull that package from the repository after the
fact, they will also stop getting updates from us.

So there is no good solution either :-(

[Christoph Maser]

Ok no we get some fun:

ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.

Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped
It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[Christoph Maser]

Ok no we get some fun:

ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.

Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped
It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[Christoph Maser]

Ok no we get some fun:

ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.

Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped
It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[Christoph Maser]

Ok no we get some fun:

ExtUtils::MakeMaker version 6.31 required--this is only version 6.30 at
Makefile.PL line 7.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at Makefile.PL line 7.

Any opions on how to solve that in a decent way?

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped
It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner
_______________________________________________
suggest mailing list
suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
http://lists.rpmforge.net/mailman/listinfo/suggest

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
version of these modules:

namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped

It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
version of these modules:

namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped

It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
version of these modules:

namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped

It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

A new version of DBIx::Class was released with dependencies on the latest
version of these modules:

namespace::clean
SQL::Abstract
Class::Accessor::Grouped

It would be appreciated if these could be updated in rpmforge.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner