[suggest] perl-libapreq2

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.

In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

Hi David,

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

++C

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser
i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

*thumbs up*

Keep up the good work!

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

--
David Steinbrunner

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

FYI, without any changes at the buildhost side, export PATH=... can be
added to the SPEC as we did for smplayer/qt stuff.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

FYI, without any changes at the buildhost side, export PATH=... can be
added to the SPEC as we did for smplayer/qt stuff.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

FYI, without any changes at the buildhost side, export PATH=... can be
added to the SPEC as we did for smplayer/qt stuff.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

FYI, without any changes at the buildhost side, export PATH=... can be
added to the SPEC as we did for smplayer/qt stuff.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

FYI, without any changes at the buildhost side, export PATH=... can be
added to the SPEC as we did for smplayer/qt stuff.

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.

In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

Hi David,

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

++C

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser
i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

*thumbs up*

Keep up the good work!

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.

In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

Hi David,

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

++C

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser
i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

*thumbs up*

Keep up the good work!

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.

In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

Hi David,

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

++C

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser
i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

*thumbs up*

Keep up the good work!

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Hello all,

Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.

In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

Thanks,

--
David Steinbrunner

[Christoph Maser]

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.
Thanks,
--
David Steinbrunner

Hi David,

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

++C

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser
i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

*thumbs up*

Keep up the good work!

--
David Steinbrunner

[David Steinbrunner]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by David Steinbrunner
Hello all,
Currnetly, rpmforge has a spec for version libapreq2 version 2.08 and did
not build when it was added in due to issues finding apxs. Currently
version 2.12 and while looking into that apxs there seems to be an
indication that older packages had issues with installing apxs correctly.
In anycase, I'm interested in seeing if a new version and new build will
being perl-libapreq2 to life.

i had a look at it and it is compiling for me on C5. I will submit an
update to svn shortly.

Ok, so the build failed. It appears the reason for this is that /usr/sbin
needs to be in the PATH when built. I'm assuming this is not the case on
the build host.

--
David Steinbrunner