[users] Where is package 'dansguardian'?

[Nicolaas Hyatt]

After looking around a few package groups I noticed that 'dansguardian'
was not included in any of the 6.0 package groups. I realize there has
been a change to the way rpmforge groups packages but I have not found
it in any of the current alternate groups either. (ie testing, extras, etc.)

I realize that I'm probably more prone to error than most, and this may
be something i'm overlooking, but if I am indeed correct, are there any
plans to include this package in the future?

Thanks in advance

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Hi!

Post by Nicolaas Hyatt
After looking around a few package groups I noticed that 'dansguardian'
was not included in any of the 6.0 package groups. I realize there has
been a change to the way rpmforge groups packages but I have not found
it in any of the current alternate groups either. (ie testing, extras, etc.)

You can always check the package build status here:

http://pkgs.repoforge.org/dansguardian/_buildlogs/

In this particular instance, apparently it just failed to build on RHEL6
because of an incompatibility with gcc-4.4.

Post by Nicolaas Hyatt
I realize that I'm probably more prone to error than most, and this may
be something i'm overlooking, but if I am indeed correct, are there any
plans to include this package in the future?

I have updated the package as per your request to the latest version (I
didn't include support for clamav as it looks like an additional
complication), but it will take awhile before it is build and pushed out
into the main repository.

In the mean time you might wish to take a look at my unsigned test
packages:

http://rpm.zaytsev.net/test/dansguardian/

If there is anything wrong with them be sure to get back to me before
they hit the repo :-)

[The_Spider]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
In this particular instance, apparently it just failed to build on RHEL6
because of an incompatibility with gcc-4.4.
- Yury V. Zaytsev

I know keeping up with new releases can't be too easy, I was just
worried that this powerful tool was not going to be included. Great
effort, and many, MANY thanks!

[Nicolaas Hyatt]

After looking around a few package groups I noticed that 'dansguardian'
was not included in any of the 6.0 package groups. I realize there has
been a change to the way rpmforge groups packages but I have not found
it in any of the current alternate groups either. (ie testing, extras, etc.)

I realize that I'm probably more prone to error than most, and this may
be something i'm overlooking, but if I am indeed correct, are there any
plans to include this package in the future?

Thanks in advance

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Hi!

Post by Nicolaas Hyatt
After looking around a few package groups I noticed that 'dansguardian'
was not included in any of the 6.0 package groups. I realize there has
been a change to the way rpmforge groups packages but I have not found
it in any of the current alternate groups either. (ie testing, extras, etc.)

You can always check the package build status here:

http://pkgs.repoforge.org/dansguardian/_buildlogs/

In this particular instance, apparently it just failed to build on RHEL6
because of an incompatibility with gcc-4.4.

Post by Nicolaas Hyatt
I realize that I'm probably more prone to error than most, and this may
be something i'm overlooking, but if I am indeed correct, are there any
plans to include this package in the future?

I have updated the package as per your request to the latest version (I
didn't include support for clamav as it looks like an additional
complication), but it will take awhile before it is build and pushed out
into the main repository.

In the mean time you might wish to take a look at my unsigned test
packages:

http://rpm.zaytsev.net/test/dansguardian/

If there is anything wrong with them be sure to get back to me before
they hit the repo :-)

[The_Spider]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
In this particular instance, apparently it just failed to build on RHEL6
because of an incompatibility with gcc-4.4.
- Yury V. Zaytsev

I know keeping up with new releases can't be too easy, I was just
worried that this powerful tool was not going to be included. Great
effort, and many, MANY thanks!