[users] yum errors

[Todd And Margo Chester]

Hi All,

Scientific Linux 6.0, 64 bit

I have both rpmforge and epel repos on my system. (Need epel
for Xfce.)

After getting my updates/upgrades, including VLC, with
yum --disablerepo=epel --skip-broken upgrade

I am left with following errors. Is there a way to
correct them?

Many thanks,
-T

# yum upgrade
Setting up Upgrade Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) for package:
vlc-1.1.10-70.el6.x86_64
---> Package libmodplug.x86_64 1:0.8.8.1-2.el6 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: vlc-1.1.10-70.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms)
Requires: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
Removing: 1:libmodplug-0.8.7-2.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms)
libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
Updated By: 1:libmodplug-0.8.8.1-2.el6.x86_64 (epel)
Not found
Available: libmodplug-0.8.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
flash-plugin-10.3.181.14-release.i386 is a duplicate with
flash-plugin-10.3.162.29-0.1.el6.rf.x86_64
pixman-0.18.4-1.el6.leigh123linux.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with
pixman-0.16.6-1.el6.i686

[Nicolas Thierry-Mieg]

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Hi All,
Scientific Linux 6.0, 64 bit
I have both rpmforge and epel repos on my system. (Need epel
for Xfce.)
After getting my updates/upgrades, including VLC, with
yum --disablerepo=epel --skip-broken upgrade
I am left with following errors. Is there a way to
correct them?

from the errors, you are also using atrpms in addition to rf and epel.

that's quite a mix, you can't just enable them all and expect things to
work out.

I recommend you choose one repo as your main 3rd party, and resort to
the other repos only for specific packages (eg all xfce related packages
from epel like you say). Use priorities and includepkgs/excludepkgs to
enforce that choice.

[Todd And Margo Chester]

Post by Nicolas Thierry-Mieg

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Hi All,
Scientific Linux 6.0, 64 bit
I have both rpmforge and epel repos on my system. (Need epel
for Xfce.)
After getting my updates/upgrades, including VLC, with
yum --disablerepo=epel --skip-broken upgrade
I am left with following errors. Is there a way to
correct them?

from the errors, you are also using atrpms in addition to rf and epel.
that's quite a mix, you can't just enable them all and expect things to
work out.
I recommend you choose one repo as your main 3rd party, and resort to
the other repos only for specific packages (eg all xfce related packages
from epel like you say). Use priorities and includepkgs/excludepkgs to
enforce that choice.

Thank you!

I can probably just disable atrpms for the time being. I don't remember
what I got from them.

Would you give me an example yum run string of "priorities and
includepkgs/excludepkgs"?

Many thanks,
-T

[Steve Huff]

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Would you give me an example yum run string of "priorities and
includepkgs/excludepkgs"?

http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities

-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
PGP 8477B706 (A92A 1F7E 6D76 16A0 BFF9 E61D AD54 0251 8477 B706)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 243 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110624/c32f76b6/attachment.bin

[Nicolas Thierry-Mieg]

Post by Steve Huff

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Would you give me an example yum run string of "priorities and
includepkgs/excludepkgs"?

http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities

you may also want to check out the following for examples of
include/exclude:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus

[Nicolas Thierry-Mieg]

Post by Steve Huff

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Would you give me an example yum run string of "priorities and
includepkgs/excludepkgs"?

http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities

you may also want to check out the following for examples of
include/exclude:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/CentOSPlus

[Steve Huff]

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Would you give me an example yum run string of "priorities and
includepkgs/excludepkgs"?

http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities

-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
PGP 8477B706 (A92A 1F7E 6D76 16A0 BFF9 E61D AD54 0251 8477 B706)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 243 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110624/c32f76b6/attachment.sig>

[Todd And Margo Chester]

Post by Nicolas Thierry-Mieg

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Hi All,
Scientific Linux 6.0, 64 bit
I have both rpmforge and epel repos on my system. (Need epel
for Xfce.)
After getting my updates/upgrades, including VLC, with
yum --disablerepo=epel --skip-broken upgrade
I am left with following errors. Is there a way to
correct them?

from the errors, you are also using atrpms in addition to rf and epel.
that's quite a mix, you can't just enable them all and expect things to
work out.
I recommend you choose one repo as your main 3rd party, and resort to
the other repos only for specific packages (eg all xfce related packages
from epel like you say). Use priorities and includepkgs/excludepkgs to
enforce that choice.

Thank you!

I can probably just disable atrpms for the time being. I don't remember
what I got from them.

Would you give me an example yum run string of "priorities and
includepkgs/excludepkgs"?

Many thanks,
-T

[Steven L. Seed]

We had the same problem. Our solution was to install the
yum-plugin-priorities package and the set "priority=X" on each of the
repos. We set the rpmforge repos to priority=2 and the epel repos to
priority=3. Now, the libmodplug problem goes away because the rpmforge
version has priority.

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Hi All,
Scientific Linux 6.0, 64 bit
I have both rpmforge and epel repos on my system. (Need epel
for Xfce.)
After getting my updates/upgrades, including VLC, with
yum --disablerepo=epel --skip-broken upgrade
I am left with following errors. Is there a way to
correct them?
Many thanks,
-T
# yum upgrade
Setting up Upgrade Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
vlc-1.1.10-70.el6.x86_64
---> Package libmodplug.x86_64 1:0.8.8.1-2.el6 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Requires: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
Updated By: 1:libmodplug-0.8.8.1-2.el6.x86_64 (epel)
Not found
Available: libmodplug-0.8.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
flash-plugin-10.3.181.14-release.i386 is a duplicate with
flash-plugin-10.3.162.29-0.1.el6.rf.x86_64
pixman-0.18.4-1.el6.leigh123linux.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with
pixman-0.16.6-1.el6.i686
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.repoforge.org
http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users

--

[Todd And Margo Chester]

Hi All,

Scientific Linux 6.0, 64 bit

I have both rpmforge and epel repos on my system. (Need epel
for Xfce.)

After getting my updates/upgrades, including VLC, with
yum --disablerepo=epel --skip-broken upgrade

I am left with following errors. Is there a way to
correct them?

Many thanks,
-T

# yum upgrade
Setting up Upgrade Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit) for package:
vlc-1.1.10-70.el6.x86_64
---> Package libmodplug.x86_64 1:0.8.8.1-2.el6 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: vlc-1.1.10-70.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms)
Requires: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
Removing: 1:libmodplug-0.8.7-2.el6.x86_64 (@atrpms)
libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
Updated By: 1:libmodplug-0.8.8.1-2.el6.x86_64 (epel)
Not found
Available: libmodplug-0.8.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
flash-plugin-10.3.181.14-release.i386 is a duplicate with
flash-plugin-10.3.162.29-0.1.el6.rf.x86_64
pixman-0.18.4-1.el6.leigh123linux.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with
pixman-0.16.6-1.el6.i686

[Nicolas Thierry-Mieg]

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Hi All,
Scientific Linux 6.0, 64 bit
I have both rpmforge and epel repos on my system. (Need epel
for Xfce.)
After getting my updates/upgrades, including VLC, with
yum --disablerepo=epel --skip-broken upgrade
I am left with following errors. Is there a way to
correct them?

from the errors, you are also using atrpms in addition to rf and epel.

that's quite a mix, you can't just enable them all and expect things to
work out.

I recommend you choose one repo as your main 3rd party, and resort to
the other repos only for specific packages (eg all xfce related packages
from epel like you say). Use priorities and includepkgs/excludepkgs to
enforce that choice.

[Steven L. Seed]

We had the same problem. Our solution was to install the
yum-plugin-priorities package and the set "priority=X" on each of the
repos. We set the rpmforge repos to priority=2 and the epel repos to
priority=3. Now, the libmodplug problem goes away because the rpmforge
version has priority.

Post by Todd And Margo Chester
Hi All,
Scientific Linux 6.0, 64 bit
I have both rpmforge and epel repos on my system. (Need epel
for Xfce.)
After getting my updates/upgrades, including VLC, with
yum --disablerepo=epel --skip-broken upgrade
I am left with following errors. Is there a way to
correct them?
Many thanks,
-T
# yum upgrade
Setting up Upgrade Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
vlc-1.1.10-70.el6.x86_64
---> Package libmodplug.x86_64 1:0.8.8.1-2.el6 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Requires: libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
Updated By: 1:libmodplug-0.8.8.1-2.el6.x86_64 (epel)
Not found
Available: libmodplug-0.8.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (rpmforge)
libmodplug.so.0()(64bit)
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
flash-plugin-10.3.181.14-release.i386 is a duplicate with
flash-plugin-10.3.162.29-0.1.el6.rf.x86_64
pixman-0.18.4-1.el6.leigh123linux.1.x86_64 is a duplicate with
pixman-0.16.6-1.el6.i686
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.repoforge.org
http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users

--