[suggest] FreeTDS 0.82

[Dan Stoner]

Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x


Packages are

freetds
freetds-devel

Previous release was 0.64.


The FreeTDS teams says this about 0.82:

"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."

Thanks,

Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/

[Dan Stoner]

Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x


Packages are

freetds
freetds-devel

Previous release was 0.64.


The FreeTDS teams says this about 0.82:

"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."

Thanks,

Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/

[Dan Stoner]

Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x


Packages are

freetds
freetds-devel

Previous release was 0.64.


The FreeTDS teams says this about 0.82:

"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."

Thanks,

Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/

[Dan Stoner]

Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x


Packages are

freetds
freetds-devel

Previous release was 0.64.


The FreeTDS teams says this about 0.82:

"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."

Thanks,

Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/

[Dan Stoner]

Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x


Packages are

freetds
freetds-devel

Previous release was 0.64.


The FreeTDS teams says this about 0.82:

"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."

Thanks,

Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/

[Dave Miller]

Doesn't look like this ever happened. I succesfully built 0.82 locally
by dropping in the new tarball and changing the version number in the
spec file, so it doesn't need a lot of work to update. :)

Post by Dan Stoner
Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x
Packages are
freetds
freetds-devel
Previous release was 0.64.
"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."
Thanks,
Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/

[Dave Miller]

Doesn't look like this ever happened. I succesfully built 0.82 locally
by dropping in the new tarball and changing the version number in the
spec file, so it doesn't need a lot of work to update. :)

Post by Dan Stoner
Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x
Packages are
freetds
freetds-devel
Previous release was 0.64.
"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."
Thanks,
Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/

[Dave Miller]

Doesn't look like this ever happened. I succesfully built 0.82 locally
by dropping in the new tarball and changing the version number in the
spec file, so it doesn't need a lot of work to update. :)

Post by Dan Stoner
Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x
Packages are
freetds
freetds-devel
Previous release was 0.64.
"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."
Thanks,
Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/

[Dave Miller]

Doesn't look like this ever happened. I succesfully built 0.82 locally
by dropping in the new tarball and changing the version number in the
spec file, so it doesn't need a lot of work to update. :)

Post by Dan Stoner
Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x
Packages are
freetds
freetds-devel
Previous release was 0.64.
"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."
Thanks,
Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/

[Dave Miller]

Doesn't look like this ever happened. I succesfully built 0.82 locally
by dropping in the new tarball and changing the version number in the
spec file, so it doesn't need a lot of work to update. :)

Post by Dan Stoner
Request for RHEL/CentOS 5.x
Packages are
freetds
freetds-devel
Previous release was 0.64.
"Users are implored to run, not walk, to their nearest Internet
connection and upgrade as soon as humanly possible."
Thanks,
Dan Stoner
http://thatlinuxbox.com/blog/