Discussion:
[users] Unhide : Centos 6 X64
repoforge
2013-06-30 23:22:49 UTC
Permalink
Wishing to install UNHIDE (unhide and unhide-tcp) on Centos 6 x64, I typed
yum install unhide
and received
No package unhide available.
----------------------------------

Investigating http://pkgs.repoforge.org/unhide/, I observed there is NO x64 version of unhide for EL6.

unhide-0.0.20110113-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm 06-Apr-2012 16:57 280K RHEL5 and CentOS-5 x86 32bit
unhide-0.0.20110113-1.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm 06-Apr-2012 16:57 294K RHEL5 and CentOS-5 x86 64bit

unhide-0.0.20110113-1.el6.rf.i686.rpm 06-Apr-2012 16:57 250K RHEL6 and CentOS-6 x86

----------------------------------

http://www.unhide-forensics.info/?Linux:Download

states "Current Stable Version: 2012-12-29"



Regards,

Always Learning.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Our computer systems are exclusively Linux. No Microsoft here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Nico Kadel-Garcia
2013-06-30 23:48:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by repoforge
Wishing to install UNHIDE (unhide and unhide-tcp) on Centos 6 x64, I typed
yum install unhide
and received
No package unhide available.
Maybe you could try building from the SRPM locally, and see if there's
a compilation issue?
Always Learning
2013-07-01 01:33:12 UTC
Permalink
Hi Nick,

You wrote:-
Post by Nico Kadel-Garcia
Maybe you could try building from the SRPM locally, and see if there's
a compilation issue?
Perhaps I could when I can find the free time. I've never compiled
anything on Linux so it would be nice to have a go and see what happens.

However, my concern were someone on Centos 6 (applies to RH and SL too)
with an 64-bit machine would get
Post by Nico Kadel-Garcia
No package unhide available.
If Repoforge wants the 32-bit version to be used by 64-bit machines
then, minimally, a softlink should be provided from the EL6 32-bit
version to the EL6 64-bit version.

Repoforge's current unhide is out-of-date and the 32-bit version is not
detected on a 64-bit machine by 'yum install unhide'.

I appreciate everything is done by unpaid volunteers and one day, if I
ever get the time, I would like to compile some sources and contribute.

rkhunter uses unhide and unhide-tcp.


With friendly greetings.
--
----------------------------------------------
100% exclusively Linux. No M$ Windoze here.
----------------------------------------------
Christopher Meng
2013-07-01 01:42:55 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

I'm doing some work with root kit now, this package is great.

I'm asking to take the ownership in Fedora and may add a branch for epel.

Thanks.
? 2013-7-1 AM9:36?"Always Learning" <repoforge at a8.u22.net>???
Post by Always Learning
Hi Nick,
You wrote:-
Post by Nico Kadel-Garcia
Maybe you could try building from the SRPM locally, and see if there's
a compilation issue?
Perhaps I could when I can find the free time. I've never compiled
anything on Linux so it would be nice to have a go and see what happens.
However, my concern were someone on Centos 6 (applies to RH and SL too)
with an 64-bit machine would get
Post by Nico Kadel-Garcia
No package unhide available.
If Repoforge wants the 32-bit version to be used by 64-bit machines
then, minimally, a softlink should be provided from the EL6 32-bit
version to the EL6 64-bit version.
Repoforge's current unhide is out-of-date and the 32-bit version is not
detected on a 64-bit machine by 'yum install unhide'.
I appreciate everything is done by unpaid volunteers and one day, if I
ever get the time, I would like to compile some sources and contribute.
rkhunter uses unhide and unhide-tcp.
With friendly greetings.
--
----------------------------------------------
100% exclusively Linux. No M$ Windoze here.
----------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users at lists.repoforge.org
http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130701/d15782b2/attachment.html>
Bryan J Smith
2013-07-01 15:28:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Always Learning
Perhaps I could when I can find the free time. I've never compiled
anything on Linux so it would be nice to have a go and see what happens.
However, my concern were someone on Centos 6 (applies to RH and SL too)
with an 64-bit machine would get
Indeed. Many times you can get into a situation where both the run-time
and, when different between 32-bit and Long Mode targets, the *-devel
package may differ. Sometimes both may be installed, although sometimes
both are not provided. There is also the environment and other
targeting/linking aspects.

Typically one wants to build a chroot build environment, a virtualized
host, etc... The Fedora Build System handles this as well. Makes it much
easier.

-- bjs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20130701/74a20518/attachment.html>
R P Herrold
2013-07-01 16:19:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Always Learning
Perhaps I could when I can find the free time. I've never compiled
anything on Linux so it would be nice to have a go and see what happens.
However, my concern were someone on Centos 6 (applies to RH and SL too)
with an 64-bit machine would get
A fedora package of the era of CentOS 6' issuance builds
trivially; so does a recent (Fedora 19 / RawHide) package

The SRPM for each is at:
ftp://ftp.owlriver.com/pub/local/ORC/unhide/
and will move into our mirror tomorrow

-- Russ herrold
Christopher Meng
2014-01-08 17:14:57 UTC
Permalink
A fedora package of the era of CentOS 6' issuance builds trivially; so does
a recent (Fedora 19 / RawHide) package
ftp://ftp.owlriver.com/pub/local/ORC/unhide/
and will move into our mirror tomorrow
Hi all, I no longer subscribe to this list, but this is just a
friendly reminder that this package will be in epel6-testing very
soon.

Thanks.
--

Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng

Noob here.

http://cicku.me
R P Herrold
2014-01-08 18:23:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Christopher Meng
Post by R P Herrold
ftp://ftp.owlriver.com/pub/local/ORC/unhide/
and will move into our mirror tomorrow
Hi all, I no longer subscribe to this list, but this is just a
friendly reminder that this package will be in epel6-testing very
soon.
great -- latest RawHide still builds trivially, and I have
pushed to that same FTP URL

unhide-1.0-10.orc6.20121229.src.rpm

-- Russ herrold

Loading...