Discussion:
[users] CentOS 4 - Gecko package for Wine?
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-22 18:01:18 UTC
Permalink
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.

However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.

This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
Dag Wieers
2010-08-23 08:56:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/

I also have wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing repository, for
those who want the latest development releases.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-23 14:57:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
As usual, I should have started from a Google search:

http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko

(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")

This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
relative to a single user home directory:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Dag Wieers
2010-08-25 13:16:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko
(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")
This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Thanks for that :-) I had experienced the same thing, but after that it
worked out fine, so forgot to look into it. I now have build and pushed
packages with the gecko cabinet file included. Please let me know if this
works fine.

Also, I have newer wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing
repository. So if you fancy testing the latest wine, you can find it
there.

Hope this helps !
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Dag Wieers
2010-08-25 13:16:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko
(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")
This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Thanks for that :-) I had experienced the same thing, but after that it
worked out fine, so forgot to look into it. I now have build and pushed
packages with the gecko cabinet file included. Please let me know if this
works fine.

Also, I have newer wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing
repository. So if you fancy testing the latest wine, you can find it
there.

Hope this helps !
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Dag Wieers
2010-08-25 13:16:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko
(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")
This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Thanks for that :-) I had experienced the same thing, but after that it
worked out fine, so forgot to look into it. I now have build and pushed
packages with the gecko cabinet file included. Please let me know if this
works fine.

Also, I have newer wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing
repository. So if you fancy testing the latest wine, you can find it
there.

Hope this helps !
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Dag Wieers
2010-08-25 13:16:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko
(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")
This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Thanks for that :-) I had experienced the same thing, but after that it
worked out fine, so forgot to look into it. I now have build and pushed
packages with the gecko cabinet file included. Please let me know if this
works fine.

Also, I have newer wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing
repository. So if you fancy testing the latest wine, you can find it
there.

Hope this helps !
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Dag Wieers
2010-08-25 13:16:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko
(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")
This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Thanks for that :-) I had experienced the same thing, but after that it
worked out fine, so forgot to look into it. I now have build and pushed
packages with the gecko cabinet file included. Please let me know if this
works fine.

Also, I have newer wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing
repository. So if you fancy testing the latest wine, you can find it
there.

Hope this helps !
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-23 14:57:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
As usual, I should have started from a Google search:

http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko

(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")

This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
relative to a single user home directory:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-23 14:57:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
As usual, I should have started from a Google search:

http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko

(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")

This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
relative to a single user home directory:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-23 14:57:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
As usual, I should have started from a Google search:

http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko

(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")

This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
relative to a single user home directory:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-23 14:57:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
Post by Bart Schaefer
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/
As usual, I should have started from a Google search:

http://wiki.winehq.org/Gecko

(Note list of distributions "known to package Gecko properly")

This thread has some detailed instructions, except for Ubuntu and
relative to a single user home directory:

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=634464
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-22 18:01:18 UTC
Permalink
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.

However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.

This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
Dag Wieers
2010-08-23 08:56:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/

I also have wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing repository, for
those who want the latest development releases.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-22 18:01:18 UTC
Permalink
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.

However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.

This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
Dag Wieers
2010-08-23 08:56:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/

I also have wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing repository, for
those who want the latest development releases.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-22 18:01:18 UTC
Permalink
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.

However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.

This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
Dag Wieers
2010-08-23 08:56:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/

I also have wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing repository, for
those who want the latest development releases.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Bart Schaefer
2010-08-22 18:01:18 UTC
Permalink
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.

However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.

This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
Dag Wieers
2010-08-23 08:56:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bart Schaefer
A couple of days ago I yum-updated to wine-1.2-1.el4.rf and related
packages. This morning I fired up my first Windows app and got the
message that the Gecko module was not installed; wine offered to
install it but I canceled that, assuming I could get it from the repo.
However, when I check the list of installable modules in Yum Extender,
there's nothing for gecko or wine that I don't already have.
This isn't causing me a problem at the moment (apparently I don't use
anything from Windows that embeds HTML processing) but I felt I should
point it out in case it's merely an oversight.
I have seen the same thing. It asks you once, but if you deny it works
nevertheless. I think it's something like a firstboot question ? Not sure
what we can do about it :-/

I also have wine 1.3.1 packages available from the testing repository, for
those who want the latest development releases.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Loading...