[users] milter-greylist error: DNSRBL support not compiled in

[Tilman Schmidt]

Hello all,

I am using the package
milter-greylist-4.2.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64
which emits the error message

DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 138
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 153

when I try to add configuration options to use DNS black/whitelists.
May I ask that this package be rebuilt with DNSRBL support?

Thanks,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120614/bb639d8d/attachment.bin

[Nicolas Thierry-Mieg]

Post by Tilman Schmidt
Hello all,
I am using the package
milter-greylist-4.2.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64
which emits the error message
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 138
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 153
when I try to add configuration options to use DNS black/whitelists.
May I ask that this package be rebuilt with DNSRBL support?
Thanks,
Tilman

I'm not an rf dev but I suggest you file an isse on github:
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/issues

if you can provide a patch to the SPEC it may help speed things up.

regards

[David Hrbáč]

Post by Tilman Schmidt
Hello all,
I am using the package
milter-greylist-4.2.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64
which emits the error message
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 138
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 153
when I try to add configuration options to use DNS black/whitelists.
May I ask that this package be rebuilt with DNSRBL support?
Thanks,
Tilman

Hi Tilman,
I have updated the spec file:
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/25441b8cf2cf0e39bbf364de128558606d72a790
Regards,
David Hrb??

[Tilman Schmidt]

Post by David Hrbáč
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/25441b8cf2cf0e39bbf364de128558606d72a790

Thanks. I'm looking forward to release -2 appearing in the repo.

Best regards,
Tilman

[Tilman Schmidt]

Post by Tilman Schmidt

Post by David Hrbáč
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/25441b8cf2cf0e39bbf364de128558606d72a790

Thanks. I'm looking forward to release -2 appearing in the repo.

Not to appear impatient, but do you have any idea when that might be?

Thanks,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120704/7bbdbfa8/attachment.bin

[Steve Huff]

Post by Tilman Schmidt
Not to appear impatient, but do you have any idea when that might be?

Tilman,

If you need a rebuilt package urgently, I recommend you build your own from source as a workaround. Instructions for doing so are available here:

http://repoforge.org/package/rebuild.html

-shuff
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
PGP 8477B706 (A92A 1F7E 6D76 16A0 BFF9 E61D AD54 0251 8477 B706)



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 243 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120704/e088420a/attachment.bin

[Tilman Schmidt]

Post by David Hrbáč

Post by Tilman Schmidt
Not to appear impatient, but do you have any idea when that might be?

Tilman,
http://repoforge.org/package/rebuild.html

Thanks, I am aware of that. Right now I am trying to collect
information in order to decide whether I might eventually
have to go that path.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120704/dedfa924/attachment.bin

[Tilman Schmidt]

Post by David Hrbáč

Post by Tilman Schmidt
Not to appear impatient, but do you have any idea when that might be?

Tilman,
http://repoforge.org/package/rebuild.html

Thanks, I am aware of that. Right now I am trying to collect
information in order to decide whether I might eventually
have to go that path.
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120704/dedfa924/attachment.sig>

[Tilman Schmidt]

Post by David Hrbáč

Post by Tilman Schmidt
Not to appear impatient, but do you have any idea when that might be?

Tilman,
http://repoforge.org/package/rebuild.html

Btw those instructions contain a few errors:

[Tilman Schmidt]

[Sorry for the preceding, half-written mail. I clicked "Send" accidentally.]

Post by Steve Huff
http://repoforge.org/package/rebuild.html

Those instructions have a few problems:

1. The first yum command installs a lot of stuff that's really not
needed, notably quite an impressive collection of version control
systems (cvs, git, subversion) and a Fortran compiler.

2. The second yum command reports:
Package rpm-build-4.8.0-27.el6.x86_64 already installed and latest version
No package rpm-macros-rpmforge available.
Package yum-utils-1.1.30-14.el6.noarch already installed and latest version
The "already installed" messages are of course just nuisances, but
I do the lack of the rpm-macros-rpmforge package won't cause trouble
once I get to actually start a rebuild.

3. The link to Russ Herrold's guide for setting up a non-root RPM
build environment appears to be dead. I used
http://binblog.info/2010/06/08/building-rpm-packages-as-non-root-user/
instead.

4. The step "Rebuilding a SRPM" fails in the present case because
http://pkgs.repoforge.org/milter-greylist/ only contains an SRPM
for release 4.2.7-1 which still lacks --enable-dnsrbl.

5. The step "Rebuilding from a specfile" lacks instructions on how
to actually retrieve the specfile from GitHub.
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/blob/master/specs/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.spec
is a web page showing the specfile so fancily formatted that it
cannot even be copied and pasted into vi without losing the
indentation. Surely there must be an URL which I can feed to wget
in order to download the actual file?

I guess I'll try unpacking the 4.2.7-1 SRPM manually and applying
David's patch to it next. I seem to remember I read instructions
for that somewhere.

[Tilman Schmidt]

With the rebuild instructions modified as described in my previous
posting, the manual rebuild succeeded and the resulting package
appears to work fine. So from my POV there's no need to hold up
the repo rebuild any further.

A minor nit, the name of the rebuilt package appears to lack the
".rf" suffix. Thus spake "yum install":

---> Package milter-greylist.x86_64 0:4.2.7-1.el6.rf will be updated
---> Package milter-greylist.x86_64 0:4.2.7-2.el6 will be an update

I assume that's another problem of the rebuild instructions, and
the RepoForge rebuild mechanism will take care of that.

HTH
T.

[Tilman Schmidt]

Post by Tilman Schmidt
With the rebuild instructions modified as described in my previous
posting, the manual rebuild succeeded and the resulting package
appears to work fine.

In the meantime, I have also rebuilt from the same specfile on
CentOS 5, without any modification, and it works equally fine.
So I'd suggest updating the package milter-greylist-3.0-2.el5.rf
currently in the el5 branch of RepoForge to that version, too.

Post by Tilman Schmidt
HTH
T.

[Steve Huff]

Post by Tilman Schmidt
Not to appear impatient, but do you have any idea when that might be?

Tilman,

If you need a rebuilt package urgently, I recommend you build your own from source as a workaround. Instructions for doing so are available here:

http://repoforge.org/package/rebuild.html

-shuff
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
PGP 8477B706 (A92A 1F7E 6D76 16A0 BFF9 E61D AD54 0251 8477 B706)



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 243 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120704/e088420a/attachment.sig>

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Tilman Schmidt

Post by Tilman Schmidt

Post by David Hrbáč
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/25441b8cf2cf0e39bbf364de128558606d72a790

Thanks. I'm looking forward to release -2 appearing in the repo.
Best regards,
Tilman

David, doesn't it require the dnsrbl package at build time for
%configure to detect it correctly?

[Tilman Schmidt]

Post by Tilman Schmidt

Post by David Hrbáč
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/25441b8cf2cf0e39bbf364de128558606d72a790

Thanks. I'm looking forward to release -2 appearing in the repo.

Not to appear impatient, but do you have any idea when that might be?

Thanks,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120704/7bbdbfa8/attachment.sig>

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Tilman Schmidt

Post by Tilman Schmidt

Post by David Hrbáč
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/25441b8cf2cf0e39bbf364de128558606d72a790

Thanks. I'm looking forward to release -2 appearing in the repo.
Best regards,
Tilman

David, doesn't it require the dnsrbl package at build time for
%configure to detect it correctly?

[Tilman Schmidt]

Post by David Hrbáč
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/25441b8cf2cf0e39bbf364de128558606d72a790

Thanks. I'm looking forward to release -2 appearing in the repo.

Best regards,
Tilman

[Tilman Schmidt]

Post by David Hrbáč

Post by Tilman Schmidt
I am using the package
milter-greylist-4.2.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64
which emits the error message
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 138
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 153
when I try to add configuration options to use DNS black/whitelists.
May I ask that this package be rebuilt with DNSRBL support?

https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/25441b8cf2cf0e39bbf364de128558606d72a790

So far I haven't seen an updated package appear. I know I should
just be patient (or rebuild the package myself), but four months
do seem a bit long. Is there really no way to find out the status
of that rebuild?

Thanks,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20121027/bc77620a/attachment-0001.sig>
-------------- next part --------------

[Tilman Schmidt]

Hello all,

I am using the package
milter-greylist-4.2.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64
which emits the error message

DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 138
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 153

when I try to add configuration options to use DNS black/whitelists.
May I ask that this package be rebuilt with DNSRBL support?

Thanks,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20120614/bb639d8d/attachment.sig>

[Nicolas Thierry-Mieg]

Post by Tilman Schmidt
Hello all,
I am using the package
milter-greylist-4.2.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64
which emits the error message
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 138
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 153
when I try to add configuration options to use DNS black/whitelists.
May I ask that this package be rebuilt with DNSRBL support?
Thanks,
Tilman

I'm not an rf dev but I suggest you file an isse on github:
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/issues

if you can provide a patch to the SPEC it may help speed things up.

regards

[David Hrbáč]

Post by Tilman Schmidt
Hello all,
I am using the package
milter-greylist-4.2.7-1.el6.rf.x86_64
which emits the error message
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 138
DNSRBL support not compiled in, ignore line 153
when I try to add configuration options to use DNS black/whitelists.
May I ask that this package be rebuilt with DNSRBL support?
Thanks,
Tilman

Hi Tilman,
I have updated the spec file:
https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/commit/25441b8cf2cf0e39bbf364de128558606d72a790
Regards,
David Hrb??