Discussion:
[users] 3.10.22-1.el4.rf distribution exclusion
David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 12:20:32 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 13:53:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
Well, should be arj-3.10.22-1.el4.rf.
DH
Dag Wieers
2010-06-10 16:33:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
David Hrbáč
2010-06-11 06:28:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
Right, I have should written "base" as extras are enabled by default.
DH
David Hrbáč
2010-06-11 06:28:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
Right, I have should written "base" as extras are enabled by default.
DH
David Hrbáč
2010-06-11 06:28:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
Right, I have should written "base" as extras are enabled by default.
DH
David Hrbáč
2010-06-11 06:28:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
Right, I have should written "base" as extras are enabled by default.
DH
David Hrbáč
2010-06-11 06:28:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dag Wieers
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
Right, I have should written "base" as extras are enabled by default.
DH

David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 12:20:32 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 13:53:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
Well, should be arj-3.10.22-1.el4.rf.
DH
Dag Wieers
2010-06-10 16:33:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 12:20:32 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 13:53:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
Well, should be arj-3.10.22-1.el4.rf.
DH
Dag Wieers
2010-06-10 16:33:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 12:20:32 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 13:53:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
Well, should be arj-3.10.22-1.el4.rf.
DH
Dag Wieers
2010-06-10 16:33:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 12:20:32 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
David Hrbáč
2010-06-10 13:53:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
Hi,
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
Regards,
David Hrb??
Well, should be arj-3.10.22-1.el4.rf.
DH
Dag Wieers
2010-06-10 16:33:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Hrbáč
package 3.10.22-1.el4.rf replaces CentOS 5 base package. I guess RF arj
package should has been built only for <el5.
There is no arj package in CentOS base, I see there is one in CentOS
extras though, also based on the Debian sources.
--
-- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
Loading...