[suggest] Could you add perl-App:Ack?

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Hi,

after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)

So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Thanks and cheers,

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100830/8d2bf314/attachment.bin

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.

Package name will be 'ack' though.

Thanks for reminding me :-)

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.
Thanks for reminding me :-)

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

+C

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

*thppppppt* =:P

Thank you very much, guys (and gals!).

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100831/169b487c/attachment.bin

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

*thppppppt* =:P

Thank you very much, guys (and gals!).

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100831/169b487c/attachment-0001.bin

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

*thppppppt* =:P

Thank you very much, guys (and gals!).

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100831/169b487c/attachment-0002.bin

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

*thppppppt* =:P

Thank you very much, guys (and gals!).

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100831/169b487c/attachment-0003.bin

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Post by Christoph Maser

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

*thppppppt* =:P

Thank you very much, guys (and gals!).

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100831/169b487c/attachment.sig>

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.
Thanks for reminding me :-)

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

+C

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.
Thanks for reminding me :-)

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

+C

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.
Thanks for reminding me :-)

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

+C

[Christoph Maser]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.
Thanks for reminding me :-)

Shouldn't that be 'perl-ack' providing 'ack'?

+C

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

[Steve Huff]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

there was a brief battle; ack beat up perl-ack, and now progress marches on :)

-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
http://five.sentenc.es

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100903/748e4520/attachment.bin

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Similar to other perl applications and python programs. The prefix is
exclusive for modules.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Hmmm, then I take it for granted that I have to delete perl-ack that was
left behind :-)

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Hmmm, then I take it for granted that I have to delete perl-ack that was
left behind :-)

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Hmmm, then I take it for granted that I have to delete perl-ack that was
left behind :-)

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Hmmm, then I take it for granted that I have to delete perl-ack that was
left behind :-)

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Hmmm, then I take it for granted that I have to delete perl-ack that was
left behind :-)

[Steve Huff]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

there was a brief battle; ack beat up perl-ack, and now progress marches on :)

-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
http://five.sentenc.es

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100903/748e4520/attachment-0001.bin

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Similar to other perl applications and python programs. The prefix is
exclusive for modules.

[Steve Huff]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

there was a brief battle; ack beat up perl-ack, and now progress marches on :)

-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
http://five.sentenc.es

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100903/748e4520/attachment-0002.bin

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Similar to other perl applications and python programs. The prefix is
exclusive for modules.

[Steve Huff]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

there was a brief battle; ack beat up perl-ack, and now progress marches on :)

-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
http://five.sentenc.es

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100903/748e4520/attachment-0003.bin

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Similar to other perl applications and python programs. The prefix is
exclusive for modules.

[Steve Huff]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev
Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

there was a brief battle; ack beat up perl-ack, and now progress marches on :)

-shuff

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
http://five.sentenc.es

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100903/748e4520/attachment.sig>

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Yury V. Zaytsev

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

perl-ack was never a good name, it should have been either perl-App-Ack or
ack. And because it is a toold and not a module, the name ack is used.

Similar to other perl applications and python programs. The prefix is
exclusive for modules.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers
Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.
Package name will be 'ack' though.

Wait, I don't get it, now we both have ack and perl-ack? Which one is
gonna win the competition of survival of the fittest?

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Hi,

after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)

So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Thanks and cheers,

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100830/8d2bf314/attachment-0001.bin

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.

Package name will be 'ack' though.

Thanks for reminding me :-)

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Hi,

after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)

So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Thanks and cheers,

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100830/8d2bf314/attachment-0002.bin

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.

Package name will be 'ack' though.

Thanks for reminding me :-)

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Hi,

after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)

So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Thanks and cheers,

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100830/8d2bf314/attachment-0003.bin

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.

Package name will be 'ack' though.

Thanks for reminding me :-)

[Angenendt, Ralph]

Hi,

after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)

So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Thanks and cheers,

Ralph

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20100830/8d2bf314/attachment.sig>

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Angenendt, Ralph
after I found http://betterthangrep.com/ today, I have no idea how I
could live without that before :)
So could you ad App::Ack (or the perl standalone version) into rpmforge?

Done. It was on my todo list after I learned it from a colleague.

Package name will be 'ack' though.

Thanks for reminding me :-)