[suggest] xmlstarlet

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Hi,

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line

spec attached

thank you

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xmlstarlet.spec
Type: text/x-rpm-spec
Size: 986 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110404/087e7a7c/attachment.bin

[Dag Wieers]

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml manipulation on
the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Hi!

I noticed that, but we have a number of patches floating around and as
far as I understand their main purpose is to change the name of the
executable from rather generic "xml" that used to conflict with
something to "xmlstarlet"

http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/xmlstarlet/

If you can provide us with a patch I am looking forward to commit it,
otherwise someone else might want to take a lead on that :-/

Thanks!

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to 1.1.0,
out today.

Yes, I already did, but the repository lags behind. You can assume pushing
takes 24 hours.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Hi!

I noticed that, but we have a number of patches floating around and as
far as I understand their main purpose is to change the name of the
executable from rather generic "xml" that used to conflict with
something to "xmlstarlet"

http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/xmlstarlet/

If you can provide us with a patch I am looking forward to commit it,
otherwise someone else might want to take a lead on that :-/

Thanks!

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to 1.1.0,
out today.

Yes, I already did, but the repository lags behind. You can assume pushing
takes 24 hours.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Hi!

I noticed that, but we have a number of patches floating around and as
far as I understand their main purpose is to change the name of the
executable from rather generic "xml" that used to conflict with
something to "xmlstarlet"

http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/xmlstarlet/

If you can provide us with a patch I am looking forward to commit it,
otherwise someone else might want to take a lead on that :-/

Thanks!

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to 1.1.0,
out today.

Yes, I already did, but the repository lags behind. You can assume pushing
takes 24 hours.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Hi!

I noticed that, but we have a number of patches floating around and as
far as I understand their main purpose is to change the name of the
executable from rather generic "xml" that used to conflict with
something to "xmlstarlet"

http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/xmlstarlet/

If you can provide us with a patch I am looking forward to commit it,
otherwise someone else might want to take a lead on that :-/

Thanks!

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to 1.1.0,
out today.

Yes, I already did, but the repository lags behind. You can assume pushing
takes 24 hours.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Hi!

I noticed that, but we have a number of patches floating around and as
far as I understand their main purpose is to change the name of the
executable from rather generic "xml" that used to conflict with
something to "xmlstarlet"

http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/xmlstarlet/

If you can provide us with a patch I am looking forward to commit it,
otherwise someone else might want to take a lead on that :-/

Thanks!

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to 1.1.0,
out today.

Yes, I already did, but the repository lags behind. You can assume pushing
takes 24 hours.

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Ups, sorry, don't know how I missed it ;) You may want to bump it to
1.1.0, out today.

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Aleksandar Ivanisevic
I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Hi,

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line

spec attached

thank you

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xmlstarlet.spec
Type: text/x-rpm-spec
Size: 986 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110404/087e7a7c/attachment-0001.bin

[Dag Wieers]

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml manipulation on
the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Hi,

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line

spec attached

thank you

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xmlstarlet.spec
Type: text/x-rpm-spec
Size: 986 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110404/087e7a7c/attachment-0002.bin

[Dag Wieers]

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml manipulation on
the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Hi,

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line

spec attached

thank you

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xmlstarlet.spec
Type: text/x-rpm-spec
Size: 986 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110404/087e7a7c/attachment-0003.bin

[Dag Wieers]

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml manipulation on
the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)

[Aleksandar Ivanisevic]

Hi,

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml
manipulation on the command line

spec attached

thank you

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xmlstarlet.spec
Type: text/x-rpm-spec
Size: 986 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110404/087e7a7c/attachment-0004.bin>

[Dag Wieers]

I'd like to suggest xmlstarlet, a really useful tool for xml manipulation on
the command line
spec attached

We already have it, and yes, it's pretty useful :)