[users] Misbehaviour -- pcsc-lite-ccid

[Alan Bartlett]

I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --

[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]

Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Alan.

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Alan Bartlett
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Sorry for being a PITA, but how about svn commit ;-)

[Alan Bartlett]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Dag Wieers

?I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
?should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
?repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
?obtained the following result --
?[quote]
?[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
?<snip>
?Excluding Packages in global exclude list
?Finished
?11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
?Obsoleting Packages
?pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 ? ? ? ?1.3.10-1.el5.rf ? ? ? ?rpmforge
? ?ccid.i386 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1.3.8-1.el5 ? ? ? ? ? ? installed
?[root at GX1 ~]#
?[/quote]
?Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Thanks Dag.

As a satisfied RPMforge user of (about) 40 months, I thought it best
to flag this issue via the -users m/l so that everybody has a chance
to see it. ;-)

Alan.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Alan Bartlett
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Sorry for being a PITA, but how about svn commit ;-)

[Alan Bartlett]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Dag Wieers

?I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
?should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
?repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
?obtained the following result --
?[quote]
?[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
?<snip>
?Excluding Packages in global exclude list
?Finished
?11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
?Obsoleting Packages
?pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 ? ? ? ?1.3.10-1.el5.rf ? ? ? ?rpmforge
? ?ccid.i386 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1.3.8-1.el5 ? ? ? ? ? ? installed
?[root at GX1 ~]#
?[/quote]
?Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Thanks Dag.

As a satisfied RPMforge user of (about) 40 months, I thought it best
to flag this issue via the -users m/l so that everybody has a chance
to see it. ;-)

Alan.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Alan Bartlett
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Sorry for being a PITA, but how about svn commit ;-)

[Alan Bartlett]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Dag Wieers

?I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
?should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
?repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
?obtained the following result --
?[quote]
?[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
?<snip>
?Excluding Packages in global exclude list
?Finished
?11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
?Obsoleting Packages
?pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 ? ? ? ?1.3.10-1.el5.rf ? ? ? ?rpmforge
? ?ccid.i386 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1.3.8-1.el5 ? ? ? ? ? ? installed
?[root at GX1 ~]#
?[/quote]
?Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Thanks Dag.

As a satisfied RPMforge user of (about) 40 months, I thought it best
to flag this issue via the -users m/l so that everybody has a chance
to see it. ;-)

Alan.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Alan Bartlett
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Sorry for being a PITA, but how about svn commit ;-)

[Alan Bartlett]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Dag Wieers

?I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
?should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
?repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
?obtained the following result --
?[quote]
?[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
?<snip>
?Excluding Packages in global exclude list
?Finished
?11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
?Obsoleting Packages
?pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 ? ? ? ?1.3.10-1.el5.rf ? ? ? ?rpmforge
? ?ccid.i386 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1.3.8-1.el5 ? ? ? ? ? ? installed
?[root at GX1 ~]#
?[/quote]
?Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Thanks Dag.

As a satisfied RPMforge user of (about) 40 months, I thought it best
to flag this issue via the -users m/l so that everybody has a chance
to see it. ;-)

Alan.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Alan Bartlett
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Sorry for being a PITA, but how about svn commit ;-)

[Alan Bartlett]

Post by Dag Wieers

Post by Dag Wieers

?I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
?should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
?repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
?obtained the following result --
?[quote]
?[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
?<snip>
?Excluding Packages in global exclude list
?Finished
?11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
?Obsoleting Packages
?pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 ? ? ? ?1.3.10-1.el5.rf ? ? ? ?rpmforge
? ?ccid.i386 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?1.3.8-1.el5 ? ? ? ? ? ? installed
?[root at GX1 ~]#
?[/quote]
?Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

Thanks Dag.

As a satisfied RPMforge user of (about) 40 months, I thought it best
to flag this issue via the -users m/l so that everybody has a chance
to see it. ;-)

Alan.

[John Thomas]

Post by Alan Bartlett
Finished

Post by Alan Bartlett
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it? Will the next yum
update automatically reverse it?

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by John Thomas
I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it?

No.

Post by John Thomas
Will the next yum update automatically reverse it?

No.

The update itself is not harmful, but it violates our policy of keeping
the base system packages intact unless user explicitly decides to
replace a base system package with an unsupported update from RPMForge.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by John Thomas
I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it?

No.

Post by John Thomas
Will the next yum update automatically reverse it?

No.

The update itself is not harmful, but it violates our policy of keeping
the base system packages intact unless user explicitly decides to
replace a base system package with an unsupported update from RPMForge.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by John Thomas
I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it?

No.

Post by John Thomas
Will the next yum update automatically reverse it?

No.

The update itself is not harmful, but it violates our policy of keeping
the base system packages intact unless user explicitly decides to
replace a base system package with an unsupported update from RPMForge.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by John Thomas
I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it?

No.

Post by John Thomas
Will the next yum update automatically reverse it?

No.

The update itself is not harmful, but it violates our policy of keeping
the base system packages intact unless user explicitly decides to
replace a base system package with an unsupported update from RPMForge.

[Yury V. Zaytsev]

Post by John Thomas
I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it?

No.

Post by John Thomas
Will the next yum update automatically reverse it?

No.

The update itself is not harmful, but it violates our policy of keeping
the base system packages intact unless user explicitly decides to
replace a base system package with an unsupported update from RPMForge.

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

[John Thomas]

Post by Alan Bartlett
Finished

Post by Alan Bartlett
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it? Will the next yum
update automatically reverse it?

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

[John Thomas]

Post by Alan Bartlett
Finished

Post by Alan Bartlett
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it? Will the next yum
update automatically reverse it?

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

[John Thomas]

Post by Alan Bartlett
Finished

Post by Alan Bartlett
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it? Will the next yum
update automatically reverse it?

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid of
it right away.

And thanks for letting us know :-)

[John Thomas]

Post by Alan Bartlett
Finished

Post by Alan Bartlett
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

I did this upgrade on my systems. Should I reverse it? Will the next yum
update automatically reverse it?

[Alan Bartlett]

I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --

[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]

Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Alan.

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

[Alan Bartlett]

I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --

[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]

Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Alan.

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

[Alan Bartlett]

I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --

[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]

Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Alan.

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.

[Alan Bartlett]

I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --

[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]

Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Alan.

[Dag Wieers]

Post by Alan Bartlett
I understand that all packages in the standard RPMforge repository
should not affect packages installed from the distribution's default
repositories. With a fully up to date 32-bit CentOS 5.5 system, I
obtained the following result --
[quote]
[root at GX1 ~]# yum --enablerepo rpmforge check-update
<snip>
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
11 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Obsoleting Packages
pcsc-lite-ccid.i386 1.3.10-1.el5.rf rpmforge
ccid.i386 1.3.8-1.el5 installed
[root at GX1 ~]#
[/quote]
Something doesn't seem quite right . . .

Ouch, we didn't catch this because the names are different. I will get rid
of it right away.