[users] Why is arj-3.10.22-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm in rpmforge instead of rpmforge-extras ???

Discussion:

chris

2011-02-11 12:41:54 UTC

Name : arj Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.10.22 Vendor: CentOS
Release : 1.el5.centos Build Date: Tue 17 Jul 2007
05:09:28 BST
Install Date: Thu 24 Jan 2008 11:51:37 GMT Build Host: v20z-x86-64
Group : Applications/Archiving Source RPM:
arj-3.10.22-1.el5.centos.src.rpm
Size : 375854 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Tue 17 Jul 2007 05:27:18 BST, Key ID
a8a447dce8562897
Packager : Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
URL : http://arj.sourceforge.net/
Summary : Archiver for .arj files

Name : arj Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.10.22 Vendor: Dag Apt
Repository, http://dag.wieers.com/apt/
Release : 1.el5.rf Build Date: Tue 08 Jun 2010
16:09:44 BST
Install Date: (not installed) Build Host:
lisse.hasselt.wieers.com
Group : Applications/Archiving Source RPM:
arj-3.10.22-1.el5.rf.src.rpm
Size : 459492 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Tue 08 Jun 2010 17:18:19 BST, Key ID
a20e52146b8d79e6
Packager : Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com>
URL : http://arj.sourceforge.net/
Summary : Archiver for .arj files
Description :

In fact, as it's the same version, why is it in rpmforge at all ??

cb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110211/1e2198c4/attachment.html

Christoph Maser

2011-02-11 12:53:00 UTC

Permalink

Post by chris
Name : arj Relocations: (not
relocatable)
Version : 3.10.22 Vendor: CentOS
Release : 1.el5.centos Build Date: Tue 17 Jul
2007 05:09:28 BST
v20z-x86-64
arj-3.10.22-1.el5.centos.src.rpm
Size : 375854 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Tue 17 Jul 2007 05:27:18 BST, Key ID
a8a447dce8562897
Packager : Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
URL : http://arj.sourceforge.net/
Summary : Archiver for .arj files
Name : arj Relocations: (not
relocatable)
Version : 3.10.22 Vendor: Dag Apt
Repository, http://dag.wieers.com/apt/
Release : 1.el5.rf Build Date: Tue 08 Jun
2010 16:09:44 BST
lisse.hasselt.wieers.com
arj-3.10.22-1.el5.rf.src.rpm
Size : 459492 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Tue 08 Jun 2010 17:18:19 BST, Key ID
a20e52146b8d79e6
Packager : Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com>
URL : http://arj.sourceforge.net/
Summary : Archiver for .arj files
In fact, as it's the same version, why is it in rpmforge at all ??
cb

Because the package you list here is in CentOS extras not CentOS base.

Chris

Yury V. Zaytsev

2011-02-11 12:53:53 UTC

Permalink

Post by chris
In fact, as it's the same version, why is it in rpmforge at all ??

It's not in base, it is in extras which is a repository for third-party
packages (supported by CentOS team, but anyway) and disabled by default.

--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

chris

2011-02-11 12:41:54 UTC

Permalink

Christoph Maser

2011-02-11 12:53:00 UTC

Permalink

Because the package you list here is in CentOS extras not CentOS base.

Chris

Yury V. Zaytsev

2011-02-11 12:53:53 UTC

Permalink

Post by chris
In fact, as it's the same version, why is it in rpmforge at all ??

It's not in base, it is in extras which is a repository for third-party
packages (supported by CentOS team, but anyway) and disabled by default.

--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

chris

2011-02-11 12:41:54 UTC

Permalink

Christoph Maser

2011-02-11 12:53:00 UTC

Permalink

Because the package you list here is in CentOS extras not CentOS base.

Chris

Yury V. Zaytsev

2011-02-11 12:53:53 UTC

Permalink

Post by chris
In fact, as it's the same version, why is it in rpmforge at all ??

It's not in base, it is in extras which is a repository for third-party
packages (supported by CentOS team, but anyway) and disabled by default.

--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

chris

2011-02-11 12:41:54 UTC

Permalink

Christoph Maser

2011-02-11 12:53:00 UTC

Permalink

Because the package you list here is in CentOS extras not CentOS base.

Chris

Yury V. Zaytsev

2011-02-11 12:53:53 UTC

Permalink

Post by chris
In fact, as it's the same version, why is it in rpmforge at all ??

It's not in base, it is in extras which is a repository for third-party
packages (supported by CentOS team, but anyway) and disabled by default.

--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev

chris

2011-02-11 12:41:54 UTC

Permalink

Name : arj Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.10.22 Vendor: CentOS
Release : 1.el5.centos Build Date: Tue 17 Jul 2007
05:09:28 BST
Install Date: Thu 24 Jan 2008 11:51:37 GMT Build Host: v20z-x86-64
Group : Applications/Archiving Source RPM:
arj-3.10.22-1.el5.centos.src.rpm
Size : 375854 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Tue 17 Jul 2007 05:27:18 BST, Key ID
a8a447dce8562897
Packager : Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>
URL : http://arj.sourceforge.net/
Summary : Archiver for .arj files

Name : arj Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.10.22 Vendor: Dag Apt
Repository, http://dag.wieers.com/apt/
Release : 1.el5.rf Build Date: Tue 08 Jun 2010
16:09:44 BST
Install Date: (not installed) Build Host:
lisse.hasselt.wieers.com
Group : Applications/Archiving Source RPM:
arj-3.10.22-1.el5.rf.src.rpm
Size : 459492 License: GPL
Signature : DSA/SHA1, Tue 08 Jun 2010 17:18:19 BST, Key ID
a20e52146b8d79e6
Packager : Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com>
URL : http://arj.sourceforge.net/
Summary : Archiver for .arj files
Description :

In fact, as it's the same version, why is it in rpmforge at all ??

cb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.repoforge.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20110211/1e2198c4/attachment-0004.html>

Christoph Maser

2011-02-11 12:53:00 UTC

Permalink

Because the package you list here is in CentOS extras not CentOS base.

Chris

Yury V. Zaytsev

2011-02-11 12:53:53 UTC

Permalink

Post by chris
In fact, as it's the same version, why is it in rpmforge at all ??

It's not in base, it is in extras which is a repository for third-party
packages (supported by CentOS team, but anyway) and disabled by default.

--
Sincerely yours,
Yury V. Zaytsev