[suggest] Re: suggest Digest, Vol 60, Issue 16

[Dave B]

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 12:00 +0100, suggest-request at lists.rpmforge.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:06:53 +0200
From: Christoph Maser <cmaser at gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: broken dependencies for some perl modules
on RHEL4
To: suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
Message-ID: <1276783613.3574.10.camel at HUB8071NC4.financial.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Though, perhaps not all of them are broken?
I think both myself and someone else have mentioned just the same 3
packages causing the issue.

I found and changed perl-DBD-Pg. Wich were the other two?
Chris

When can we expect to see the new perl-DBD-Pg hit the repos? Linux boxen
are still showing up2date failing due to:

perl-DBD-Pg-2.17.1-1.el4.rf requires perl >= 5.006001

thanks!

[Dave B]

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 12:00 +0100, suggest-request at lists.rpmforge.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:06:53 +0200
From: Christoph Maser <cmaser at gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: broken dependencies for some perl modules
on RHEL4
To: suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
Message-ID: <1276783613.3574.10.camel at HUB8071NC4.financial.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Though, perhaps not all of them are broken?
I think both myself and someone else have mentioned just the same 3
packages causing the issue.

I found and changed perl-DBD-Pg. Wich were the other two?
Chris

When can we expect to see the new perl-DBD-Pg hit the repos? Linux boxen
are still showing up2date failing due to:

perl-DBD-Pg-2.17.1-1.el4.rf requires perl >= 5.006001

thanks!

[Dave B]

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 12:00 +0100, suggest-request at lists.rpmforge.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:06:53 +0200
From: Christoph Maser <cmaser at gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: broken dependencies for some perl modules
on RHEL4
To: suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
Message-ID: <1276783613.3574.10.camel at HUB8071NC4.financial.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Though, perhaps not all of them are broken?
I think both myself and someone else have mentioned just the same 3
packages causing the issue.

I found and changed perl-DBD-Pg. Wich were the other two?
Chris

When can we expect to see the new perl-DBD-Pg hit the repos? Linux boxen
are still showing up2date failing due to:

perl-DBD-Pg-2.17.1-1.el4.rf requires perl >= 5.006001

thanks!

[Dave B]

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 12:00 +0100, suggest-request at lists.rpmforge.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:06:53 +0200
From: Christoph Maser <cmaser at gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: broken dependencies for some perl modules
on RHEL4
To: suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
Message-ID: <1276783613.3574.10.camel at HUB8071NC4.financial.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Though, perhaps not all of them are broken?
I think both myself and someone else have mentioned just the same 3
packages causing the issue.

I found and changed perl-DBD-Pg. Wich were the other two?
Chris

When can we expect to see the new perl-DBD-Pg hit the repos? Linux boxen
are still showing up2date failing due to:

perl-DBD-Pg-2.17.1-1.el4.rf requires perl >= 5.006001

thanks!

[Dave B]

On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 12:00 +0100, suggest-request at lists.rpmforge.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:06:53 +0200
From: Christoph Maser <cmaser at gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [suggest] Re: broken dependencies for some perl modules
on RHEL4
To: suggest at lists.rpmforge.net
Message-ID: <1276783613.3574.10.camel at HUB8071NC4.financial.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Though, perhaps not all of them are broken?
I think both myself and someone else have mentioned just the same 3
packages causing the issue.

I found and changed perl-DBD-Pg. Wich were the other two?
Chris

When can we expect to see the new perl-DBD-Pg hit the repos? Linux boxen
are still showing up2date failing due to:

perl-DBD-Pg-2.17.1-1.el4.rf requires perl >= 5.006001

thanks!